Footmark.info
SEO Site Score, overview, meta information, keywords consistency, whois data, backlinks counter, usability, page insights, mobile friendliness, speed tips for Footmark.info
SEO Site Score, overview, meta information, keywords consistency, whois data, backlinks counter, usability, page insights, mobile friendliness, speed tips for Footmark.info
<H1> | <H2> | <H3> | <H4> | <H5> | <H6> |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 1 | 1 | 20 | 0 | 0 |
<H1> MIS 腳印 </H1> |
<H2> 記錄 IT 學習的軌跡 </H2> |
<H3> 所有文章 </H3> |
MIS 腳印 - 網頁程式設計, CeentOS 網站伺服器, IT 記錄
footmark.info/
「MIS 腳印」專注於電腦技術相關研究,特別是 Linux (CentOS) 伺服器架設建置與網頁程式設計 (HTML、CSS、JavaScript、Vue.js、PHP、Node.js 和 MySQL/MariaDB 等)。
Text content size | 3268 bytes |
Total HTML size | 63434 bytes |
Domain Age: 3 Years, 26 Days
Created Date: 19th-Jun-2018
Updated Date: 20th-Jun-2021
Expiry Date: 19th-Jun-2022
Domain Name: footmark.info |
Registry Domain ID: D503300000109793849-LRMS |
Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.godaddy.com |
Registrar URL: http://www.godaddy.com |
Updated Date: 2021-06-20T09:02:23Z |
Footmark.info desktop website speed is fast. Page speed is important for both search engines and visitors end.
Domains (TLD) | Status |
---|---|
footmark.com | Already Registered |
footmark.net | Already Registered |
footmark.org | Already Registered |
footmark.biz | Available |
footmark.io | Already Registered |
Domains (TLD) | Status |
---|---|
fotmark.info | Available |
cootmark.info | Available |
dootmark.info | Available |
eootmark.info | Available |
rootmark.info | Available |
Footmark.info mobile website speed is medium range. Page speed is important for both search engines and visitors end.
Server IP | Server Location | Service Provider |
---|---|---|
34.96.220.253 | Taiwan | Chunghwa Telecom |
Anchor | Type | Follow |
---|---|---|
https://www.footmark.info/ | Internal Links | Dofollow |
關於我 | Internal Links | Dofollow |
聯絡我 | Internal Links | Dofollow |
Linux | Internal Links | Dofollow |
嵌入式系統 | Internal Links | Dofollow |
Social
Social Data
Cost and overhead previously rendered this semi-public form of communication unfeasible.
But advances in social networking technology from 2004-2010 has made broader concepts of sharing possible.